Kemi Badenoch, the new leader of the UK Conservatives, is currently under heavy criticism from her own community.

The Nigerian diaspora, both in the UK and around the world, has reacted strongly to Kemi Badenoch's anti-immigration stance. Many argue that her comments perpetuate negative stereotypes and seem to turn her back on the community her heritage reflects. The sense of betrayal arises from the belief that leaders with shared cultural or ethnic backgrounds should be more understanding of immigrant struggles.

Rather, her remarks are seen as a denial of her origins, leading to widespread disapproval.

On social media, Nigerians have voiced their objections and worries. On platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram, both Nigerians and supporters have shared personal experiences with immigration issues, highlighting the reality that conflicts with Badenoch's views. The hashtag #NotAllSkinfolkAreKinfolk has gained traction as a motto, pointing out that sharing heritage doesn't automatically mean mutual support or advocacy.

Within community discussions and public conversations, there's a strong need to address not only Badenoch's views but also the wider impact of her rhetoric on policy and societal views on immigration. This dialogue is characterized by demands for responsibility and efforts to uplift voices backing fair and empathetic immigration policies. The Nigerian community's reaction underscores the value of genuine representation and the ongoing battle for social justice among immigrant populations.

Recently, Abike Dabiri, the head of the Nigerian Diaspora Commission, stated on Twitter that the new Conservative leader has ignored her outreach attempts. The accusation against Kemi Badenoch from the NiDCOM Head revolves around the belief that Badenoch has been dismissive or negligent of her Nigerian roots. This comes in light of Badenoch's political choices and public remarks that seem disconnected from the values and interests of Nigerians within and outside of Nigeria.

The NiDCOM leader highlighted concerns about Badenoch, as a significant political figure, often neglecting or minimizing her ties to Nigeria, choosing instead to adopt viewpoints that don't honor or acknowledge her dual heritage. This has triggered a debate on what responsibilities political figures with ties abroad have, especially concerning expectations that they should advocate for their native communities.

The criticisms suggest that, despite her power, Badenoch has not adequately addressed or engaged with the socio-political concerns affecting Nigerians, missing opportunities for positive change through her advocacy. The critique questions her role and positioning, encouraging her to better recognize and incorporate her Nigerian heritage into her political and public endeavors, while also fostering a larger conversation on identity and representation in politics.